|
The Science of BSE 2: Blood - July 18, 2006
Scientists
and researchers worldwide continue to study
BSE and other transmissible spongiform encephalopathies
with an eye toward eliminating risk of infection,
both in animals and humans. But, as the occurrence
of BSE appears to be diminishing naturally,
there are questions as to how much society
will benefit from this research. This second
in a series of five articles looks at research
into testing blood for TSEs.
By Chris Clayton
DTN Staff Reporter
ROCKVILLE,
Md. (DTN) -- For a disease that can't
be diagnosed until the victim is dead, a blood
test is a scientific Holy Grail.
Diseases caused by abnormal proteins called prions -- bovine spongiform encephalopathy, chronic wasting disease and variant Cruetzfeldt Jakob -- have long incubation periods and are only conclusively diagnosed by examining brains and central nervous systems after the victims have died. Those who are infected only show symptoms in the last few months of their lives and the signs often can be misinterpreted.
With that in mind, reports are
continually declaring someone else may have
created the first blood test that can detect
BSE in cattle or variant CJD (vCJD) in humans.
So far, no government or scientific agency
has approved any such tests for use. Nor have
any government agencies adopted any guidelines
or standards for such tests.
The potential market for a blood test is driving researchers to
form companies to develop a test that is safe,
accurate, easy, quick and affordable. "It's
a race to develop," said Paul Brown, a former
National Institute of Health researcher who
is now a consultant on transmissible spongiform
encephalopathy-related diseases. "It's clear
there are different levels of advance from
different laboratories, which is nothing to
be ashamed of."
Housed in a small generic office building just outside Washington,
D.C., a handful of researchers and marketers
at Adlyfe Inc. are trying to refine a blood
test they believe works. Adlyfe was one of
eight companies or research groups working
on prospective blood tests that explained
their work at a conference in Baltimore in
March on prion diseases. The meeting drew
about 150 scientists from around the world
and focused heavily on the possibility of
developing a blood test, particularly for
humans.
Adlyfe started in July 2003 when researcher Cindy Orser received a $1.3 million grant to create a prion-detection test from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA, an obscure agency within the U.S. Department of Defense. The military has funded prion research because the problem was identified as a threat the country was unprepared to handle. The military has spent about $42 million on prion research during the past five years.
Virtually all the other companies
searching for a live blood test base their
results on antibodies. Adlyfe takes a different
route and uses peptides, which are links of
amino acids. The peptides mimic the reaction
of the target prions, or abnormal proteins,
thereby confirming the presence and amplifying
the production of the prions. "Because of
that, we are able to measure the prions in
a very sensitive manner," said Adlyfe CEO
Alan Rudolph, a former DARPA staff member,
who joined the company to help recruit potential
investors. While millions of sheep and tens
of thousands of cattle have been infected
by TSEs, the major market is for a human blood
test. A vCJD diagnostic test would have an
immediate demand in countries such as England,
which Rudolph described "is a clear market
of need."
England has now had at least 161 documented cases of vCJD, the next highest country is France with 17 known cases. A recent risk assessment in England also showed roughly 3,800 more people, virtually all of whom are under age 30, could be carriers of the abnormal protein that causes vCJD, leaving them susceptible to the disease and able to spread it to others through blood transfusions.
Researchers also suspect at least three people in England have died
from vCJD they contracted through blood transfusions
from someone who also was later diagnosed
as having died from vCJD. Twenty-four other
known potential victims in England have been
notified they also received blood transfusions
from people infected with vCJD. "There is
very strong evidence that variant CJD can
be transmitted through blood transfusions,"
Dr. Bob Will of the Creutzfeldt Jakob Disease
Unit at Western General Hospital in Edinburgh,
Scotland, said at a recent conference on TSEs
in London.
More cases of sporadic CJD can affect people in the later stages of life. The U.S. has had 968 such cases of sporadic CJD since 1997, according to the National Prion Disease Pathology Surveillance Center at Case Western University in Cleveland. England has had 586 cases of sporadic CJD since 1997.
A person can conceivably carry misfolded prions in their blood without
ever actually getting vCJD. While no therapeutic
treatment exists for CJD diseases, a test
could at least prevent a person who is positive
for prion infection from donating blood. "While
the cattle industry, for example, might not
be willing to test every cow, blood tests
for humans are likely because of a policy
that there is zero tolerance for an unsafe
blood supply," Rudolph said.
Any potential test is at least two years from being ready to present
to a regulatory agency. Researchers who have
studied TSEs extensively say companies haven't
been able to effectively provide enough research
material on their tests. Companies don't have
the body of data necessary to make a valid
claim. "The tendency at the moment is to have
a little bit of data on BSE, a little bit
of data on scrapie and a little bit of data
on variant CJD and they go around presenting
this to naive audiences, shall we say," said
Danny Matthews, head of the TSE research group
for the Veterinary Laboratories Agency in
Weybridge, England, in an interview with DTN.
The most likely market might be
tests for people, but studies right now must
largely focus on livestock and lab animals.
Researchers at companies can continually inoculate
mice with a prion diseases and test the blood,
but there is only a very limited ability to
conduct vCJD tests because of the miniscule
number of known cases worldwide, Rudolph said.
"There are so few patients you can't run a
standard clinical trial," he said. "One of
the challenges all of us face is access to
samples. There are just not a lot of samples
of endemic disease. In the prion field, it's
tough."
One of the world's most renowned experts on BSE, German scientist
Martin Groschup, is skeptical that a blood
test will become viable anytime soon given
some disappointing results he has seen while
attempting to evaluate research from companies.
"I personally don't believe a live test for
BSE is around the corner," he said at the
London conference.
Several firms such as Adlyfe have reported finding prions in the
blood. Scientists for those companies are
becoming more convinced blood shows one of
the broadest detections of prions, though
they are dispersed. Proving prions are in
blood doesn't prove they are infectious. It
could, however, raise red flags on the precautions
used to prevent the spread of prion diseases.
"If they prove to be correct, then it shows
something has to be happening in the blood
that we haven't been able to detect," Matthews
said.
While acknowledging much work still is needed, Matthews said he
has seen presentations on potential blood
tests and wonders if the research is collectively
making a case for blood tests. "When you look
at the big picture, several different test
companies show there is something here to
consider," he said.
Matthews' sentiments are echoed by scientists such as Alex Raeber,
director of research for Prionics AG in Switzerland,
one of the premier global companies in developing
current post-mortem BSE tests used today.
"If two or three or four tests get the same
result, we can feel confident in the result,"
Raeber said at the London conference.
Rudolph said live tests could
prompt some regulatory policy changes. In
livestock, for instance, the Food and Drug
Administration continues to exempt cattle
blood products from the feed ban for ruminants,
allowing dried blood products to be fed back
to cattle as a protein supplement. "If this
continues to be validated that prion misfolds
are in the blood and they are infectious,
this would be a big issue regarding keeping
bovine blood in feed," Rudolph said.
A blood test could be beneficial
testing for scrapie in sheep or chronic-wasting
disease in the wild animal population. But
live testing may be a little late for cattle.
The number of positive BSE cases globally,
particularly in England, is steadily declining
due largely to feed bans and removing risk
materials such as brains and spinal cords
from the food supply. "As the number of positive
animals goes down in Europe there may be less
clamoring for more testing," Rudolph said.
USDA scientists are also working
on diagnostic tests related to blood, but
USDA officials said they are not at a point
where they can discuss that work. USDA officials
and most meatpacking companies have adamantly
opposed testing all slaughter cattle. Even
an animal that may carry prion proteins would
not show positive until later in life, at
least 30 months of age. Only a handful of
cases have been recorded globally of cattle
testing positive younger than that. Blood
tests showing positives in animals before
clinical signs occur changes the debate.
If prions are in blood, what about
meat? USDA officials maintain meat, from animals
of any age, is safe. That's the case even
if a blood test found prions in cattle less
than 30 months of age. "We never said that
the prion isn't found in meat," said Ron DeHaven,
administrator for USDA's Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service. "What we're saying
is the meat is not infectious. And I say 'we'
[meaning] this is what the international scientists
are saying."
Still, a government wanting to reopen export trade could blitz-test the cattle herd and show BSE is minimal or not there. Countries with BSE have been required to make dramatic changes to their industries and carcass value has been lost as a result of the risk protections. Using a live blood test, companies could re-establish markets for some lost, previously salable parts of carcasses. Meat plants could certify their slaughter animals and may not have to take out specified-risk materials
"It may be worth it if you look at total market costs," Matthews said. "That might add value to your breeding stock."
Our next installment in the series looks at research on chronic wasting disease.
Chris Clayton can be reached at chris.clayton@dtn.com
|